• NUMBER OF SCHOOL PER SQUARE MILE 2022

    Number of basic education [Pre-Pry, Pry, Jnr Sec] and Sen Sec schools per square mile

    Top 12 States

    1 Lagos — 12 schools per sq. mile

    2 Anambra — 2

    3 Abia — 2

    4 Imo — 2

    5 Enugu — 1

    6 Ogun — 1

    7 Kano — 1

    8 FCT — 1

    9 Akwa Ibom — 1

    10 Osun — 1

    11 Ekiti — 1

    12 Ebonyi — 1

    NC NW SE SS SW

    Credit: Statisense

    (FME, NEMIS)
    🇳🇬NUMBER OF SCHOOL PER SQUARE MILE 2022 Number of basic education [Pre-Pry, Pry, Jnr Sec] and Sen Sec schools per square mile Top 12 States 1 🟣Lagos — 12 schools per sq. mile 2 🟢Anambra — 2 3 🟢Abia — 2 4 🟢Imo — 2 5 🟢Enugu — 1 6 🟣Ogun — 1 7 🔴Kano — 1 8 🟠FCT — 1 9 🟤Akwa Ibom — 1 10 🟣Osun — 1 11 🟣Ekiti — 1 12 🟢Ebonyi — 1 🟠NC 🔴NW 🟢SE 🟤SS 🟣SW Credit: Statisense (FME, NEMIS)
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·250 Views
  • In Pictures: Former Bayelsa State Governor, Timipre Sylva on tuesday paid a condolence visit to the family of the late elder statesman, Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark, at his residence in Abuja

    Chief Clark who is the founder of the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) died on February 17, 2025, at the age of 97.

    NigerDelta Insider
    In Pictures: Former Bayelsa State Governor, Timipre Sylva on tuesday paid a condolence visit to the family of the late elder statesman, Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark, at his residence in Abuja Chief Clark who is the founder of the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) died on February 17, 2025, at the age of 97. NigerDelta Insider
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·1K Views
  • Publicist, Dave of Africa, Weighs in on Lagos State Assembly Crisis, Advises Rivers State on Political Engagement

    Port Harcourt-based publicist and media entrepreneur, Owudogu Tuetara Dave popularly known as Dave of Africa, has shared his thoughts on the ongoing political issues in the Lagos State House of Assembly. According to him, while the media has covered the developments extensively, public interest remains low, with Lagos residents showing little engagement in discussions or online debates.

    Dave of Africa pointed out that there have been very few press releases from youth groups or political organizations regarding the matter.

    He compared this to Rivers State, where political issues often spark widespread reactions, with multiple stakeholders, including activists and politicians, making public statements and amplifying the discourse.

    "This is why Lagos continues to appear as if nothing bad is happening, when in reality, many damaging things are taking place," he stated. "The lack of public outcry allows issues to be swept under the rug, creating an illusion of stability while serious problems persist."

    He further advised that Rivers State could learn from this approach. While it is important to hold leaders accountable, he noted that constantly over-amplifying political issues could work against the state's image and development.

    "Striking a balance is key. Rivers people must ensure that issues are addressed effectively without creating unnecessary panic or giving the state a negative reputation," he added.

    Dave of Africa’s perspective highlights a crucial difference in political engagement between the two states and raises questions about how public perception influences governance and accountability.

    NigerDelta Insider
    Publicist, Dave of Africa, Weighs in on Lagos State Assembly Crisis, Advises Rivers State on Political Engagement Port Harcourt-based publicist and media entrepreneur, Owudogu Tuetara Dave popularly known as Dave of Africa, has shared his thoughts on the ongoing political issues in the Lagos State House of Assembly. According to him, while the media has covered the developments extensively, public interest remains low, with Lagos residents showing little engagement in discussions or online debates. Dave of Africa pointed out that there have been very few press releases from youth groups or political organizations regarding the matter. He compared this to Rivers State, where political issues often spark widespread reactions, with multiple stakeholders, including activists and politicians, making public statements and amplifying the discourse. "This is why Lagos continues to appear as if nothing bad is happening, when in reality, many damaging things are taking place," he stated. "The lack of public outcry allows issues to be swept under the rug, creating an illusion of stability while serious problems persist." He further advised that Rivers State could learn from this approach. While it is important to hold leaders accountable, he noted that constantly over-amplifying political issues could work against the state's image and development. "Striking a balance is key. Rivers people must ensure that issues are addressed effectively without creating unnecessary panic or giving the state a negative reputation," he added. Dave of Africa’s perspective highlights a crucial difference in political engagement between the two states and raises questions about how public perception influences governance and accountability. NigerDelta Insider
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·3K Views
  • When Barack Obama became the first Black president of the United States, Africa rejoiced. Many saw his Kenyan roots as a sign that African nations would receive more support and respect from the U.S. However, looking back, Obama’s policies toward Africa tell a different story—one that includes political interference, regime changes, and economic setbacks.

    At the top of the list of controversies is the 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the brutal killing of Muammar Gaddafi. Under Obama’s leadership, the U.S. played a significant role in the military action that destabilized Libya, turning the once-prosperous nation into a war-torn state plagued by terrorism and human trafficking. Before his downfall, Gaddafi had been pushing for a united Africa with a single currency backed by gold—a move that would have reduced Africa’s dependence on Western financial systems. His removal not only caused chaos in Libya but also had ripple effects across Africa, fueling instability in Mali, Nigeria, and the broader Sahel region.

    Another major incident tied to Obama’s tenure was the role his administration allegedly played in the removal of Nigeria’s former president, Goodluck Jonathan. Reports suggest that the U.S. government’s stance against Jonathan, particularly due to disagreements over Nigeria’s approach to LGBTQ+ rights and counterterrorism policies, influenced the 2015 elections in favor of Muhammadu Buhari. While Buhari's presidency was welcomed by some, many Nigerians later criticized his administration for worsening economic conditions and security challenges.

    Obama’s foreign policy also had economic consequences for Africa. His administration prioritized military cooperation over economic partnerships, leading to increased U.S. military presence in places like Niger, Somalia, and Djibouti. While framed as a fight against terrorism, this militarization often exacerbated conflicts rather than solving them. Additionally, despite early promises, Obama failed to deliver significant trade benefits for Africa. His much-publicized Power Africa initiative, which aimed to boost electricity access, fell short of expectations, leaving many African nations still struggling with energy shortages.

    Beyond policies, there was also a cultural and ideological push that many Africans found troubling. The Obama administration aggressively promoted progressive social policies that clashed with the conservative values held by many African societies. This approach created tensions between the U.S. and several African governments, leading to strained diplomatic relations.

    Ultimately, Obama’s presidency, which began with high hopes for Africa, ended with many feeling disillusioned. While his legacy remains complex, it is clear that his administration’s actions did not always align with the best interests of African nations. Instead of empowerment, many African countries experienced deeper instability, weakened leadership, and increased foreign influence—outcomes that still shape the continent today.
    When Barack Obama became the first Black president of the United States, Africa rejoiced. Many saw his Kenyan roots as a sign that African nations would receive more support and respect from the U.S. However, looking back, Obama’s policies toward Africa tell a different story—one that includes political interference, regime changes, and economic setbacks. At the top of the list of controversies is the 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the brutal killing of Muammar Gaddafi. Under Obama’s leadership, the U.S. played a significant role in the military action that destabilized Libya, turning the once-prosperous nation into a war-torn state plagued by terrorism and human trafficking. Before his downfall, Gaddafi had been pushing for a united Africa with a single currency backed by gold—a move that would have reduced Africa’s dependence on Western financial systems. His removal not only caused chaos in Libya but also had ripple effects across Africa, fueling instability in Mali, Nigeria, and the broader Sahel region. Another major incident tied to Obama’s tenure was the role his administration allegedly played in the removal of Nigeria’s former president, Goodluck Jonathan. Reports suggest that the U.S. government’s stance against Jonathan, particularly due to disagreements over Nigeria’s approach to LGBTQ+ rights and counterterrorism policies, influenced the 2015 elections in favor of Muhammadu Buhari. While Buhari's presidency was welcomed by some, many Nigerians later criticized his administration for worsening economic conditions and security challenges. Obama’s foreign policy also had economic consequences for Africa. His administration prioritized military cooperation over economic partnerships, leading to increased U.S. military presence in places like Niger, Somalia, and Djibouti. While framed as a fight against terrorism, this militarization often exacerbated conflicts rather than solving them. Additionally, despite early promises, Obama failed to deliver significant trade benefits for Africa. His much-publicized Power Africa initiative, which aimed to boost electricity access, fell short of expectations, leaving many African nations still struggling with energy shortages. Beyond policies, there was also a cultural and ideological push that many Africans found troubling. The Obama administration aggressively promoted progressive social policies that clashed with the conservative values held by many African societies. This approach created tensions between the U.S. and several African governments, leading to strained diplomatic relations. Ultimately, Obama’s presidency, which began with high hopes for Africa, ended with many feeling disillusioned. While his legacy remains complex, it is clear that his administration’s actions did not always align with the best interests of African nations. Instead of empowerment, many African countries experienced deeper instability, weakened leadership, and increased foreign influence—outcomes that still shape the continent today.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·1K Views