• This is the greatest comeback story in history:

    At 12, This Man witnessed his father’s murder.

    Later Lost his life savings on 3 failed startups.

    Bet everything on one last idea.

    Today, his company is worth $3 billion.

    This is the story of Tope Awotona, the Nigerian-born tech. entrepreneur, founder of Calendly

    and the 3 lessons his journey teaches us about failure, resilience, and success:

    At just 12 years old, young Tope witnessed his father’s murder during a carjacking in Lagos.

    That moment shattered his world.

    But little did he know, this tragedy would ignite a fire within him,
    a drive to build something extraordinary.

    After his father’s death, Tope moved to America as a teenager.

    He studied computer science at the University of Georgia but found himself drawn to sales roles.

    Yet, something was missing.

    He wanted to create something that mattered.

    So, he took the leap into entrepreneurship.

    His first venture? An e-commerce site selling projectors.

    It failed

    His second startup? A garden tools business.

    It failed too

    His third attempt? A dating website.

    That also crashed and burned

    Each failure cost him time, money, and confidence.

    But each one also taught him something invaluable:

    His first failure exposed the importance of supply chain management.

    His second failure showed him the value of operational efficiency.

    His third failure taught him about market timing and the need for proper funding.

    By 2013, Tope was out of money, out of ideas, and out of options.

    But he wasn’t out of the fight.

    He had one last idea, and he went all in.

    Invested his entire life savings, $200,000, into a scheduling tool called Calendly .

    Friends thought he was crazy.

    Investors called the idea "boring" and "unscalable."

    But Tope had discovered a universal pain point: the endless back-and-forth emails just to schedule a single meeting.

    He knew this wasn’t just an annoyance, it was a productivity killer.

    With no external funding, Tope hired Ukrainian contractors to build the first version of Calendly.

    He kept it simple:

    A clean interface.

    Easy functionality.

    One core problem solved perfectly.

    And it worked.

    Calendly spread like wildfire.

    Freelancers loved its simplicity.
    Sales teams appreciated its efficiency.
    Recruiters shared it with their networks.

    By 2020, Calendly was generating over $70 million in annual recurring revenue.

    Then, COVID hit.

    The world shifted to remote work, and virtual meetings became the norm.

    Calendly became essential.

    In 2021, investors who once dismissed Tope’s idea poured in $350 million.

    Calendly’s valuation skyrocketed to $3 billion.

    Today, Tope Awotona is worth over $1 Billion dollars become the few Nigerian-born Entrepreneurs who has crossed the billionaire line

    The boy who witnessed tragedy in Lagos had built a tech empire.

    But His journey revealed three profound truths about success to Us:

    - Rejection is redirection

    Every failed startup taught Tope something critical.
    The lessons from those failures became the foundation for Calendly’s success.

    - Solve real problems

    Calendly didn’t chase trends, it solved a pain point Tope experienced firsthand.
    The best ideas come from personal frustration.

    - Constraints breed creativity

    With no funding, Tope focused on simplicity.
    That constraint became Calendly’s greatest strength.

    Tope Awotona’s story is proof that success isn’t about avoiding failure it’s about learning from it.

    So, the next time you face rejection, remember Tope Awotona’’s journey.

    Your greatest comeback could be just one idea away.

    #TechStories
    #calendly
    #tope
    This is the greatest comeback story in history: At 12, This Man witnessed his father’s murder. Later Lost his life savings on 3 failed startups. Bet everything on one last idea. Today, his company is worth $3 billion. This is the story of Tope Awotona, the Nigerian-born tech. entrepreneur, founder of Calendly and the 3 lessons his journey teaches us about failure, resilience, and success: At just 12 years old, young Tope witnessed his father’s murder during a carjacking in Lagos. That moment shattered his world. But little did he know, this tragedy would ignite a fire within him, a drive to build something extraordinary. After his father’s death, Tope moved to America as a teenager. He studied computer science at the University of Georgia but found himself drawn to sales roles. Yet, something was missing. He wanted to create something that mattered. So, he took the leap into entrepreneurship. His first venture? An e-commerce site selling projectors. It failed His second startup? A garden tools business. It failed too His third attempt? A dating website. That also crashed and burned Each failure cost him time, money, and confidence. But each one also taught him something invaluable: His first failure exposed the importance of supply chain management. His second failure showed him the value of operational efficiency. His third failure taught him about market timing and the need for proper funding. By 2013, Tope was out of money, out of ideas, and out of options. But he wasn’t out of the fight. He had one last idea, and he went all in. Invested his entire life savings, $200,000, into a scheduling tool called Calendly . Friends thought he was crazy. Investors called the idea "boring" and "unscalable." But Tope had discovered a universal pain point: the endless back-and-forth emails just to schedule a single meeting. He knew this wasn’t just an annoyance, it was a productivity killer. With no external funding, Tope hired Ukrainian contractors to build the first version of Calendly. He kept it simple: A clean interface. Easy functionality. One core problem solved perfectly. And it worked. Calendly spread like wildfire. Freelancers loved its simplicity. Sales teams appreciated its efficiency. Recruiters shared it with their networks. By 2020, Calendly was generating over $70 million in annual recurring revenue. Then, COVID hit. The world shifted to remote work, and virtual meetings became the norm. Calendly became essential. In 2021, investors who once dismissed Tope’s idea poured in $350 million. Calendly’s valuation skyrocketed to $3 billion. Today, Tope Awotona is worth over $1 Billion dollars become the few Nigerian-born Entrepreneurs who has crossed the billionaire line The boy who witnessed tragedy in Lagos had built a tech empire. But His journey revealed three profound truths about success to Us: - Rejection is redirection Every failed startup taught Tope something critical. The lessons from those failures became the foundation for Calendly’s success. - Solve real problems Calendly didn’t chase trends, it solved a pain point Tope experienced firsthand. The best ideas come from personal frustration. - Constraints breed creativity With no funding, Tope focused on simplicity. That constraint became Calendly’s greatest strength. Tope Awotona’s story is proof that success isn’t about avoiding failure it’s about learning from it. So, the next time you face rejection, remember Tope Awotona’’s journey. Your greatest comeback could be just one idea away. #TechStories #calendly #tope
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·2كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • On this day in 2016, Microsoft made its biggest move at the time: acquiring LinkedIn for $26.2 billion.

    The platform kept its name and CEO, Jeff Weiner, but became central to Satya Nadella’s broader vision to push Microsoft beyond software and into the heart of professional life. While the Activision Blizzard deal eventually surpassed it in size, LinkedIn remains one of Microsoft’s most strategic assets—fueling its growth in enterprise tools, cloud services, and AI-powered learning.

    Today, it has over 1.2 billion members and draws nearly 1.8 billion visits each month. It counts over 234 million users in the U.S. alone. Nearly 43% of all consumers have a LinkedIn profile, and one in four engage with brand content daily. Most users are 25–34, with Gen Z quickly joining as they enter the workforce.

    Almost a decade after the deal, LinkedIn has grown far beyond a digital résumé—it’s where careers are built and business happens.

    (h/t Sprout Social, Statista)
    🗓️ On this day in 2016, Microsoft made its biggest move at the time: acquiring LinkedIn for $26.2 billion. The platform kept its name and CEO, Jeff Weiner, but became central to Satya Nadella’s broader vision to push Microsoft beyond software and into the heart of professional life. While the Activision Blizzard deal eventually surpassed it in size, LinkedIn remains one of Microsoft’s most strategic assets—fueling its growth in enterprise tools, cloud services, and AI-powered learning. Today, it has over 1.2 billion members and draws nearly 1.8 billion visits each month. It counts over 234 million users in the U.S. alone. Nearly 43% of all consumers have a LinkedIn profile, and one in four engage with brand content daily. Most users are 25–34, with Gen Z quickly joining as they enter the workforce. Almost a decade after the deal, LinkedIn has grown far beyond a digital résumé—it’s where careers are built and business happens. (h/t Sprout Social, Statista)
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·594 مشاهدة
  • David Coote the Premier League referee who was sacked now works for Evri as a delivery person to make aliving after drugs got him banned from football.

    “I want to get on with my life. I’m trying to move forwards and regain a sense of responsibility and purpose. The job is keeping me busy and occupied; it’s not a new long-term career.”, reports The Sun

    Say no to drugs
    David Coote the Premier League referee who was sacked now works for Evri as a delivery person to make aliving after drugs got him banned from football. 🗣️ “I want to get on with my life. I’m trying to move forwards and regain a sense of responsibility and purpose. The job is keeping me busy and occupied; it’s not a new long-term career.”, reports The Sun Say no to drugs
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·990 مشاهدة
  • “The $100 million we invested in Iroko TV was a mistake. If I had another opportunity, I would not do it again.”

    Jason Njoku shares his terrible, brutal experience running Iroko TV.

    Let's read him:

    STREAMING IN NIGERIA. DID THE MARKET WIN?

    Iroko’s first funding was in August 2011; our mandate was to build a large streaming business in Nigeria.

    Tiger Global believed that one of the largest growth areas would be online entertainment, and like most content, the winners would be local content in large domestic markets.

    They invested $200 million in Netflix back in 2010 and then invested in IVI in Russia, YY in China, Netmovies in Brazil, and us in Nigeria.

    With super-expensive data bundles and inelegant payment options (I remember waiting for Interswitch to enable us to integrate), our market took a while to mature. In most opportunities, you can be too early or too late; only in hindsight can you gauge when the best time to strike would be. iROKOtv was very early when we launched in 2011, but we were fortunate that there was a ready-made international market in the diaspora who were willing to pay and able to overcome any technical hurdles (payment/bandwidth/devices) to enable us to at least generate a sizable income.

    We actually waited until 2015 (four years post-launch), building the product, securing a sizable content library, and assembling a team to attempt to take on Nigeria and Africa. Between the revenues we generated and the venture capital we raised ($35 million) over the first ten years, we easily spent $100 million trying to win.

    But we weren’t winning; we weren’t really losing either. We were just there, in full survival mode, operating in the toughest conditions possible. Streaming, even domestically, is a scale game.

    Africa wasn’t immune to those costs. It’s incredibly expensive across marketing, content, delivery, and product platforms. Our largest, most serious competitors were Showmax, Netflix, Amazon, and Iflix. Collectively, they easily invested $1 billion or more from 2015 to 2023.

    During that period, we often had tense board meetings about why iROKOtv wasn’t succeeding; it was challenging to feel that all my hard work and dedication were constantly reduced to “you’re not doing enough”.

    We have been, and remain, the most aggressive in trying to distribute content across Nigeria—deploying hundreds of manned kiosks, teams of outbound contact centre agents, creating agency networks, adjusting our product to prioritise Android downloads, and pioneering peer-to-peer file sharing.

    At one point, it dawned on me, and I finally shot back in a board meeting: if iROKOtv was losing, could they point to someone who was beating us? In the startup world, that’s usually the outcome of underperformance.

    You are simply being out-executed by a better-capitalised or higher-performing startup. In this case, there simply wasn’t anything anyone could point to to establish that.

    So my simple assertion was that the market was winning. In 2019, we went out to fundraise; for the first time, we used a bank, Stanbic IBTP, to support that.

    We were looking for $10-20 million to keep pushing into and across Africa with our outbound, agency, and kiosk models.

    I believed my tales of survival would inspire the (primarily) PE investors that we were going to be the eventual winners in a brutal, long-fought civil streaming war. Instead, they all largely concluded that perhaps there was no market there, that the unit economics were simply not viable at any reasonable scale.

    What they were all interested in was the ROK content, TV channels, and distribution business. It was straightforward (fewer than 30 employees), had clear revenue recognition (billion-dollar paid TV platforms – DStv, Multichoice, SKY, etc., with 3-5 year contracts in non-local currencies), and was amassing a sizable IP library funded by the same paid TV platforms. Once we separated out ROK, it was clear where the value lay in Iroko. It represented 80% of revenues and 25% of costs. EBITA margins of 35-40% were achieved without even realising it.

    The outcome of that fundraise was the $25 million partial exit (Iroko sold her shares; Mrs Njoku remains a significant shareholder in the studio) to Vivendi/Canal+.

    We closed in July 2019.

    Before the end of 2019, we had distributed $5 million as a special dividend and were primed to take on the world.

    Then COVID-19 happened. Streaming temporarily boomed in the West (our North American business tripled in subscriber growth), while Nigeria closed borders and grappled with peculiar economic principles (devaluations, FX windows, etc.).

    The local market in Nigeria simply collapsed. We saw it and stubbornly decided to keep investing and doubling down until we were all tapped out, having burnt through most of the post-exit capital. To save iROKOtv, we considered crowdfunding, an AIM LSE listing (you could raise $10-30 million easily back then) with relatively little revenue but a strong narrative.

    In the end, we raised $1.1 million in convertible notes, then recapped the company a year later and paid it back.

    In 2023, we finally accepted there was no market for paid premium services and exited Nigeria. We haven’t processed any Naira payments there in almost two years.

    As I humbly survey the wreckage of the last 15 years of streaming in Nigeria and Africa, it’s clear our (then $2k GDP per capita) was too small to support even a $5/mo product. It’s clear this wasn’t even a question of capital.

    Showmax alone continues to pour tens, if not hundreds, of millions to make it work. But the global giants tapped out last year; their costs (content and marketing) were clearly unsustainably high, and their product needed to be localised to make sense and actually work; it’s just not how platforms sustainably scale.

    So I wasn’t surprised when either Amazon or Netflix rolled back their considerable investments in Nigeria. $5/mo is a luxury I doubt even 250k can reliably afford in Nigeria.

    You can see the impact of what GOtv and DStv are suffering at the hands of the market. It’s okay that we tried and failed. It’s okay that we accept the limitations in the domestic market we find ourselves in. Did it need $1B+ to figure this out?

    Absolutely not. I believe, with my newfound knowledge, that iROKOtv could have reached the same conclusions with $5-10 million versus the $100 million+ we ended up investing.

    In hindsight, streaming wasn’t the winning model for Nollywood in Nigeria. Content, channels, and distribution were.

    With the economics that business had in 2018, we could have shut down iROKOtv and her $5 million/year in losses and either listed it or just had a fantastically profitable business.

    But I was a believer and walked away from millions of dollars in personal liquidity to put it all in to build streaming in Africa.

    My lessons were expensive, and that’s why I am so consistent in telling founders not to over-raise.

    I am not surprised by the story of Obi from Kobo360; I lobbied him pre-$30m raise not to raise too much capital or later on to seek a merger with his nearest competitor whilst they were engaged in a brutal price war.

    The unit economics and payment cycles were brutal, and capital wasn’t going to dramatically change the market dynamics, and it appeared that no one was really going to win that market. It’s only with deep, lived, and expensive experience that I can glance at unit economics coldly and get a feel for whether, with the usual macro turbulence, a startup has a better chance at long-term success.

    Nigeria is currently a massive drag on the entire operating business of Multichoice. Their most recent H1 reports indicate.

    Reminder that this is the largest pay platform in Africa, which is currently being acquired in a $2.8B deal.
    “The $100 million we invested in Iroko TV was a mistake. If I had another opportunity, I would not do it again.” Jason Njoku shares his terrible, brutal experience running Iroko TV. Let's read him: STREAMING IN NIGERIA. DID THE MARKET WIN? Iroko’s first funding was in August 2011; our mandate was to build a large streaming business in Nigeria. Tiger Global believed that one of the largest growth areas would be online entertainment, and like most content, the winners would be local content in large domestic markets. They invested $200 million in Netflix back in 2010 and then invested in IVI in Russia, YY in China, Netmovies in Brazil, and us in Nigeria. With super-expensive data bundles and inelegant payment options (I remember waiting for Interswitch to enable us to integrate), our market took a while to mature. In most opportunities, you can be too early or too late; only in hindsight can you gauge when the best time to strike would be. iROKOtv was very early when we launched in 2011, but we were fortunate that there was a ready-made international market in the diaspora who were willing to pay and able to overcome any technical hurdles (payment/bandwidth/devices) to enable us to at least generate a sizable income. We actually waited until 2015 (four years post-launch), building the product, securing a sizable content library, and assembling a team to attempt to take on Nigeria and Africa. Between the revenues we generated and the venture capital we raised ($35 million) over the first ten years, we easily spent $100 million trying to win. But we weren’t winning; we weren’t really losing either. We were just there, in full survival mode, operating in the toughest conditions possible. Streaming, even domestically, is a scale game. Africa wasn’t immune to those costs. It’s incredibly expensive across marketing, content, delivery, and product platforms. Our largest, most serious competitors were Showmax, Netflix, Amazon, and Iflix. Collectively, they easily invested $1 billion or more from 2015 to 2023. During that period, we often had tense board meetings about why iROKOtv wasn’t succeeding; it was challenging to feel that all my hard work and dedication were constantly reduced to “you’re not doing enough”. We have been, and remain, the most aggressive in trying to distribute content across Nigeria—deploying hundreds of manned kiosks, teams of outbound contact centre agents, creating agency networks, adjusting our product to prioritise Android downloads, and pioneering peer-to-peer file sharing. At one point, it dawned on me, and I finally shot back in a board meeting: if iROKOtv was losing, could they point to someone who was beating us? In the startup world, that’s usually the outcome of underperformance. You are simply being out-executed by a better-capitalised or higher-performing startup. In this case, there simply wasn’t anything anyone could point to to establish that. So my simple assertion was that the market was winning. In 2019, we went out to fundraise; for the first time, we used a bank, Stanbic IBTP, to support that. We were looking for $10-20 million to keep pushing into and across Africa with our outbound, agency, and kiosk models. I believed my tales of survival would inspire the (primarily) PE investors that we were going to be the eventual winners in a brutal, long-fought civil streaming war. Instead, they all largely concluded that perhaps there was no market there, that the unit economics were simply not viable at any reasonable scale. What they were all interested in was the ROK content, TV channels, and distribution business. It was straightforward (fewer than 30 employees), had clear revenue recognition (billion-dollar paid TV platforms – DStv, Multichoice, SKY, etc., with 3-5 year contracts in non-local currencies), and was amassing a sizable IP library funded by the same paid TV platforms. Once we separated out ROK, it was clear where the value lay in Iroko. It represented 80% of revenues and 25% of costs. EBITA margins of 35-40% were achieved without even realising it. The outcome of that fundraise was the $25 million partial exit (Iroko sold her shares; Mrs Njoku remains a significant shareholder in the studio) to Vivendi/Canal+. We closed in July 2019. Before the end of 2019, we had distributed $5 million as a special dividend and were primed to take on the world. Then COVID-19 happened. Streaming temporarily boomed in the West (our North American business tripled in subscriber growth), while Nigeria closed borders and grappled with peculiar economic principles (devaluations, FX windows, etc.). The local market in Nigeria simply collapsed. We saw it and stubbornly decided to keep investing and doubling down until we were all tapped out, having burnt through most of the post-exit capital. To save iROKOtv, we considered crowdfunding, an AIM LSE listing (you could raise $10-30 million easily back then) with relatively little revenue but a strong narrative. In the end, we raised $1.1 million in convertible notes, then recapped the company a year later and paid it back. In 2023, we finally accepted there was no market for paid premium services and exited Nigeria. We haven’t processed any Naira payments there in almost two years. As I humbly survey the wreckage of the last 15 years of streaming in Nigeria and Africa, it’s clear our (then $2k GDP per capita) was too small to support even a $5/mo product. It’s clear this wasn’t even a question of capital. Showmax alone continues to pour tens, if not hundreds, of millions to make it work. But the global giants tapped out last year; their costs (content and marketing) were clearly unsustainably high, and their product needed to be localised to make sense and actually work; it’s just not how platforms sustainably scale. So I wasn’t surprised when either Amazon or Netflix rolled back their considerable investments in Nigeria. $5/mo is a luxury I doubt even 250k can reliably afford in Nigeria. You can see the impact of what GOtv and DStv are suffering at the hands of the market. It’s okay that we tried and failed. It’s okay that we accept the limitations in the domestic market we find ourselves in. Did it need $1B+ to figure this out? Absolutely not. I believe, with my newfound knowledge, that iROKOtv could have reached the same conclusions with $5-10 million versus the $100 million+ we ended up investing. In hindsight, streaming wasn’t the winning model for Nollywood in Nigeria. Content, channels, and distribution were. With the economics that business had in 2018, we could have shut down iROKOtv and her $5 million/year in losses and either listed it or just had a fantastically profitable business. But I was a believer and walked away from millions of dollars in personal liquidity to put it all in to build streaming in Africa. My lessons were expensive, and that’s why I am so consistent in telling founders not to over-raise. I am not surprised by the story of Obi from Kobo360; I lobbied him pre-$30m raise not to raise too much capital or later on to seek a merger with his nearest competitor whilst they were engaged in a brutal price war. The unit economics and payment cycles were brutal, and capital wasn’t going to dramatically change the market dynamics, and it appeared that no one was really going to win that market. It’s only with deep, lived, and expensive experience that I can glance at unit economics coldly and get a feel for whether, with the usual macro turbulence, a startup has a better chance at long-term success. Nigeria is currently a massive drag on the entire operating business of Multichoice. Their most recent H1 reports indicate. Reminder that this is the largest pay platform in Africa, which is currently being acquired in a $2.8B deal.
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·3كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • The House of Reps is considering a bill that seeks to impose a seven-year j@il sentence or a N5 million fine on anyone found guilty of giving or receiving bribes in workplaces across Nigeria.
    The House of Reps is considering a bill that seeks to impose a seven-year j@il sentence or a N5 million fine on anyone found guilty of giving or receiving bribes in workplaces across Nigeria.
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·391 مشاهدة
  • This is the first president (Tinubu) who stopped the subsidy and the first who merged the dollar. That's why we are suffering; Nigerians are not used to working hard. We are used to getting cheap money. People sleep in their houses get dollars and sell them at high rates. So this is the president that says if you are ready to make money, do it the right way.

    - Senator Orji Uzor Kalu.
    This is the first president (Tinubu) who stopped the subsidy and the first who merged the dollar. That's why we are suffering; Nigerians are not used to working hard. We are used to getting cheap money. People sleep in their houses get dollars and sell them at high rates. So this is the president that says if you are ready to make money, do it the right way. - Senator Orji Uzor Kalu.
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·822 مشاهدة
  • One of google's biggest problems is hiding their biggest features and apps inside a maze of links, design and the incessant urge to attach the word "Google" to any of their inventions.
    Today, I tried to find the link to use Google veo 3, bro! I searched and searched and searched.

    That's one of the things that killed Google plus+, to access it, you had to start googling the link which is weirdly "plus.google.com", no serious social network had a subdomain as its main link.
    They are making the same with all their inventions in Google AI studio, it is a maze of links and google searches to discover the url to any of their AI.

    Crazy.
    One of google's biggest problems is hiding their biggest features and apps inside a maze of links, design and the incessant urge to attach the word "Google" to any of their inventions. Today, I tried to find the link to use Google veo 3, bro! I searched and searched and searched. That's one of the things that killed Google plus+, to access it, you had to start googling the link which is weirdly "plus.google.com", no serious social network had a subdomain as its main link. They are making the same with all their inventions in Google AI studio, it is a maze of links and google searches to discover the url to any of their AI. Crazy.
    1 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·707 مشاهدة
  • There are rumors suggesting that Vice President Osinbajo may work with Atiku Abubakar in the 2027 presidential election. Although these speculations are circulating, they have not yet been confirmed by Osinbajo.

    If this coalition materializes, it could become one of the strongest alliances in Nigerian politics, given the prominent figures involved. Should their plans succeed, it may result in Tinubu being unseated in 2027.

    Additionally, the Labour Party's caretaker committee has granted Peter Obi the go-ahead to negotiate with the coalition party.
    There are rumors suggesting that Vice President Osinbajo may work with Atiku Abubakar in the 2027 presidential election. Although these speculations are circulating, they have not yet been confirmed by Osinbajo. If this coalition materializes, it could become one of the strongest alliances in Nigerian politics, given the prominent figures involved. Should their plans succeed, it may result in Tinubu being unseated in 2027. Additionally, the Labour Party's caretaker committee has granted Peter Obi the go-ahead to negotiate with the coalition party.
    Wow
    1
    · 0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·1كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • Jony Ive, the legendary designer behind the iPhone, is officially teaming up with OpenAI. The company plans to acquire Ive’s design firm, LoveFrom, in a deal valued at around $6.5 billion. Ive will take on a broad role at OpenAI, helping shape the look and feel of future AI devices and tools.⁠

    He’s working closely with CEO Sam Altman to develop a new kind of consumer hardware centered on artificial intelligence. While specifics are still under wraps, the goal is to create products that feel as natural and intuitive as the iPod or iPhone once did, now powered by advanced AI.⁠

    The partnership has been in the works for months and marks one of OpenAI’s biggest steps toward building physical products. With Ive’s design vision and Altman’s AI focus, this collaboration could help define the next era of tech.⁠

    (via The Wall Street Journal)
    Jony Ive, the legendary designer behind the iPhone, is officially teaming up with OpenAI. The company plans to acquire Ive’s design firm, LoveFrom, in a deal valued at around $6.5 billion. Ive will take on a broad role at OpenAI, helping shape the look and feel of future AI devices and tools.⁠ ⁠ He’s working closely with CEO Sam Altman to develop a new kind of consumer hardware centered on artificial intelligence. While specifics are still under wraps, the goal is to create products that feel as natural and intuitive as the iPod or iPhone once did, now powered by advanced AI.⁠ ⁠ The partnership has been in the works for months and marks one of OpenAI’s biggest steps toward building physical products. With Ive’s design vision and Altman’s AI focus, this collaboration could help define the next era of tech.⁠ ⁠ (via The Wall Street Journal)
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·1كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • ‎EFCC Hands Over 753 Houses Allegedly Owned By Emefiele To FG

    ‎The Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development on Tuesday announced that it has taken delivery of the 753 housing units in the Abuja housing estate of the former Central Bank Governor, Godwin Emefiele

    ‎The Executive Chairman of EFCC, Mr Olanipekun Olukoyede, officially handed over the housing estate to the Minister of Housing and Urban Development in Abuja.

    ‎The EFCC boss also emphasised the need for accountability and transparency in managing forfeited assets, informing of the directive from President Bola Tinubu to hand over the asset to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development for completion.

    ‎"It is important for us to demonstrate to Nigerians that whatever proceeds of crime that we have recovered in the course of our work, the application of that will be made transparent to Nigerians so that we will not allow looted assets to be looted again,”

    ‎EFCC Hands Over 753 Houses Allegedly Owned By Emefiele To FG ‎ ‎The Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development on Tuesday announced that it has taken delivery of the 753 housing units in the Abuja housing estate of the former Central Bank Governor, Godwin Emefiele ‎ ‎The Executive Chairman of EFCC, Mr Olanipekun Olukoyede, officially handed over the housing estate to the Minister of Housing and Urban Development in Abuja. ‎ ‎The EFCC boss also emphasised the need for accountability and transparency in managing forfeited assets, informing of the directive from President Bola Tinubu to hand over the asset to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development for completion. ‎ ‎"It is important for us to demonstrate to Nigerians that whatever proceeds of crime that we have recovered in the course of our work, the application of that will be made transparent to Nigerians so that we will not allow looted assets to be looted again,” ‎
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·1كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • Many people are letting emotions cloud their judgment when it comes to the recent drama surrounding Veekee James and a designer allegedly copying her work. While it’s natural to defend someone you admire, business—especially in today’s social media age—operates on strategy, not sentiment.

    Here’s the truth: in fashion, smaller brands that mimic successful designers can pose a serious threat, no matter how established the original brand is. It’s not just about who came first or who is more “original.” Sometimes, the imitator uses the attention from that comparison to launch themselves into the spotlight.

    That seems to be what’s happening here. The emerging designer may appear less skilled or less known, but he’s cleverly positioning himself to benefit from the controversy. He’s using Veekee’s fame as a springboard, and honestly, it’s a smart—if risky—move.

    It only takes one celebrity endorsement to change everything. If a major name decides to give him a shot, and he delivers a bold, fresh design, the internet will explode. People will forget about who copied whom. Instead, they’ll say, “Wow, look what he did!” And unfortunately, Veekee could still catch criticism in the fallout.

    That’s why I believe Veekee should’ve played it differently. Publicly reacting gave him the validation he needed. If she had stayed silent and let her legal team quietly handle things, he would’ve had less momentum. Instead, now he gets to be “the guy who copied Veekee”—and that alone could drive his visibility and sales.

    In public relations, some individuals act like leeches. They latch onto bigger names, hoping to gain relevance by association. This designer might seem harmless now, but his entire strategy relies on the Veekee brand to boost his own.

    And let’s be honest, the internet is emotional and unpredictable. The designer seems to know this—and he’s aimed his strategy squarely at a Nigerian audience that loves an underdog story. If he pulls off one standout piece for a celebrity, the same fans who supported Veekee could turn around and say, “See? He’s even better.”

    Bottom line: don’t underestimate a small brand just because they look like they’re copying. Sometimes, that’s exactly the plan. In this game, staying calm, strategic, and legally smart is the best defense.

    Veekee didn’t need to respond with emotion. She needed to respond with silence and strength. That alone would have disrupted his plan entirely.
    Many people are letting emotions cloud their judgment when it comes to the recent drama surrounding Veekee James and a designer allegedly copying her work. While it’s natural to defend someone you admire, business—especially in today’s social media age—operates on strategy, not sentiment. Here’s the truth: in fashion, smaller brands that mimic successful designers can pose a serious threat, no matter how established the original brand is. It’s not just about who came first or who is more “original.” Sometimes, the imitator uses the attention from that comparison to launch themselves into the spotlight. That seems to be what’s happening here. The emerging designer may appear less skilled or less known, but he’s cleverly positioning himself to benefit from the controversy. He’s using Veekee’s fame as a springboard, and honestly, it’s a smart—if risky—move. It only takes one celebrity endorsement to change everything. If a major name decides to give him a shot, and he delivers a bold, fresh design, the internet will explode. People will forget about who copied whom. Instead, they’ll say, “Wow, look what he did!” And unfortunately, Veekee could still catch criticism in the fallout. That’s why I believe Veekee should’ve played it differently. Publicly reacting gave him the validation he needed. If she had stayed silent and let her legal team quietly handle things, he would’ve had less momentum. Instead, now he gets to be “the guy who copied Veekee”—and that alone could drive his visibility and sales. In public relations, some individuals act like leeches. They latch onto bigger names, hoping to gain relevance by association. This designer might seem harmless now, but his entire strategy relies on the Veekee brand to boost his own. And let’s be honest, the internet is emotional and unpredictable. The designer seems to know this—and he’s aimed his strategy squarely at a Nigerian audience that loves an underdog story. If he pulls off one standout piece for a celebrity, the same fans who supported Veekee could turn around and say, “See? He’s even better.” Bottom line: don’t underestimate a small brand just because they look like they’re copying. Sometimes, that’s exactly the plan. In this game, staying calm, strategic, and legally smart is the best defense. Veekee didn’t need to respond with emotion. She needed to respond with silence and strength. That alone would have disrupted his plan entirely.
    Like
    1
    · 0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·2كيلو بايت مشاهدة
  • Feds Release Photos of Sex Workers involved in the Freak-Offs with Diddy & Cassie
    Feds Release Photos of Sex Workers involved in the Freak-Offs with Diddy & Cassie 👀😳
    0 التعليقات ·0 المشاركات ·487 مشاهدة
الصفحات المعززة